In the context of electromagnetism and optics, **polarization** typically refers to the orientation or the alignment of the electric field vectors of an electromagnetic wave. The concept of "polarization" inversely proportional to something is not straightforward without context, as polarization itself is an orientation property. However, in certain scenarios, specific quantities related to polarization may have an inverse relationship with other physical quantities.
Here are a few relevant examples where polarization is inversely proportional to some factors:
### 1. **In Materials – Polarizability and Electric Field**
In the case of dielectric materials, **polarization** refers to the dipole moment per unit volume of a material in response to an applied electric field. This type of polarization depends on the material's **polarizability**, a measure of how easily its molecules can be polarized (i.e., aligned) by an external electric field.
The relationship between **polarization (P)** and **electric field (E)** in a material can be expressed as:
\[
P = \alpha E
\]
Where \( \alpha \) is the polarizability of the material.
In this context, if we consider that polarization is **inversely proportional to the permittivity of the material** in certain cases:
\[
P \propto \frac{1}{\epsilon_r}
\]
Here, \( \epsilon_r \) is the relative permittivity of the material, indicating how well the material resists forming an electric field inside it. In other words, in materials with a higher relative permittivity, the induced polarization (P) for a given electric field is lower, meaning polarization is inversely proportional to the relative permittivity.
### 2. **Wave Polarization and Wavelength**
In optics, when dealing with polarized light, the **degree of polarization** can sometimes be inversely proportional to the **wavelength** of the light in specific contexts, such as scattering phenomena.
For example, in **Rayleigh scattering**, where light is scattered by small particles (smaller than the wavelength of the light), the intensity of the polarized scattered light is inversely proportional to the **fourth power of the wavelength** of the incident light:
\[
I \propto \frac{1}{\lambda^4}
\]
This explains why shorter wavelengths (blue light) scatter more than longer wavelengths (red light), leading to phenomena like the blue color of the sky.
### 3. **Inverse Relationship with Frequency (in Resonance Phenomena)**
In some cases involving **molecular polarization**, the ease with which a material's molecules respond to an alternating electric field (i.e., how easily it polarizes) can be inversely proportional to the **frequency** of the applied field. As frequency increases, especially near or above the material’s resonant frequency, the molecules cannot align fast enough with the oscillating electric field, reducing polarization. This is observed in materials subject to alternating electric fields where:
\[
P \propto \frac{1}{\omega^2}
\]
Where \( \omega \) is the angular frequency of the applied electric field.
### Summary
In different physical contexts, polarization can be inversely proportional to:
- **Permittivity** of a material (in electric polarization),
- **Wavelength** (in light scattering or optical phenomena),
- **Frequency** (in molecular polarization in high-frequency electric fields).
Each of these situations reflects a different facet of polarization, depending on whether it’s referring to material polarization in response to electric fields or polarization of electromagnetic waves.