In a current differential protection scheme, the goal is to compare the currents entering and leaving a protected zone (like a transformer or generator) to detect faults. The scheme relies on measuring the currents at various points using
Current Transformers (CTs) and then comparing them. For proper operation, the scheme assumes that the sum of the currents entering and leaving the zone should ideally be zero, unless there’s a fault.
However,
CT saturation is a key issue to handle because when the current through the CT becomes very high (like during a fault), the CT may "saturate." Saturation means that the CT core cannot linearly follow the primary current anymore, distorting the current waveform and making the CT output inaccurate. This could lead to incorrect protection operation, potentially missing faults or giving false trips.
Here’s how a differential protection scheme generally handles
CT saturation:
1. Use of High-Saturation-Point CTs:
Modern differential protection schemes often use CTs with a higher saturation point. These are designed to saturate at higher currents, allowing them to operate correctly during typical fault conditions without saturating too early.
2. Incorporating Saturation Detection:
Advanced protection relays can detect when a CT is likely saturating by checking the
ratio of the current inputs. If the CTs on both sides of the differential zone have a mismatch that doesn’t align with expected fault conditions (i.e., a large current imbalance), the relay can suspect saturation and adjust its logic.
-
Differential percentage restraint: This means the relay allows a certain percentage difference between the currents before declaring a fault. It helps account for minor differences and avoids unnecessary trips due to saturation or other transient conditions.
3. Harmonic Restraint:
When CTs saturate, they create harmonic components (typically the
2nd harmonic), which can be detected by the protection relay. Many modern relays use
2nd harmonic restraint to ignore these harmonics during fault conditions. They do this by looking for significant 2nd harmonic content in the current signal and then adjusting their fault detection algorithm to avoid misoperation caused by CT saturation.
- For example, the relay might delay its tripping action if it detects that the 2nd harmonic component is unusually high, signaling that the CT might be saturating and the differential protection may not be reliable.
4. High-Speed CT Clamping:
Some schemes use
clamping techniques, where the relay effectively limits the maximum current measurement during fault conditions to prevent it from being affected by CT saturation. This ensures that the relay can still detect faults correctly even in the presence of significant current magnitudes.
5. Multiple CTs or Low-Resistance CTs:
In some designs, multiple CTs may be used in parallel or
low-resistance CTs that minimize the effect of saturation. These designs help reduce the risk of a CT saturating during a high fault current.
6. Differential Thresholding:
The protection relay may use a
threshold value for the differential current, which is adjusted based on expected fault scenarios and the characteristics of the CTs. By setting a proper threshold, the scheme can differentiate between normal operational conditions and a fault.
In Summary:
A current differential protection scheme handles CT saturation by:
- Using CTs with high saturation points.
- Detecting harmonic distortions (especially 2nd harmonic) caused by saturation and adjusting its logic.
- Implementing restraint and thresholding techniques to prevent unnecessary tripping due to saturation.
- Adjusting settings based on the protection device’s capabilities and the nature of the fault.
By combining these techniques, modern protection schemes can maintain reliable operation even during conditions where CT saturation might otherwise cause misoperation.